On 24-nov-03, at 17:35, Marius Groeger wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Jaap-Jan Boor wrote: > >> Yes I do on 2.4.20 and 2.4.22 from kernel.org. So far all seems >> to work but didn't do any measurements on it. >> (I both use the preempt and low-latency patches) > > AFAIK, you can pretty much drop the low-latency patch in favor of > using the lock-breaking patch. It is also available from Robert Love > at the cited home page.
Yes, thanks, I know. Is it better? I thought both low-latency and lock-break do more or less the same. Jaap-Jan > > Marius > > -- > Marius Groeger <mgroeger at sysgo.de> > Project Manager > > SYSGO Real-Time Solutions AG | Embedded and Real-Time Software > Am Pfaffenstein 14 > 55270 Klein-Winternheim, Germany > > Voice: +49-6136-9948-0 | FAX: +49-6136-9948-10 > www.sysgo.de | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
