On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 21:51, Cort Dougan wrote: > > Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the > wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when > trying to find where the working trees are. > > } The patch below adds support for IBM's Arctic-II development system, > } based on the 405LP processor. For now this is just the core support, > } more drivers coming soon. Are there any objections, or suggestions > } for doing things better before I commit this to linuxppc_2_4_devel? > }
This brings up some really good questions. I have support for three new platforms based on the _2_4_devel tree which I'd like to get submitted soon [so far, I've just been following along] So, * Which tree should be best for new development/ports/etc? * What's the best process for proposing changes? I've seen many patches come along on this list, but it's not clear to me if/when they made it to any particular tree. Thanks. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | MLB Associates | Consulting for the +1 (970) 229-1963 | Embedded world http://www.mlbassoc.com/ | email: <gary at mlbassoc.com> | gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc ------------------------------------------------------------ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
