Thanks for reply, I made a mistake while typing the message.
In reality I was asking how difficult would it be to port USB part of kernel from 2.6.10 to 2.6.13, but I mixed kernel version's when typing. Mike Rapoport wrote: > Uros Borovsak wrote: > > >> Hello, >> >> Can you at least give me some idea how difficult would it be to patch >> USB part of kernel from 2.6.13 to 2.6.10? >> >> >> > As far as I know USB core undergone signifcant changes between 2.6.10 > and 2.6.13. Still it's hard to tell how difficult would it be to > backport USB from 2.6.13 to 2.6.10. > Besides, it maybe worth upgrading your kernel instead of backporing > USB to 2.6.10. > > Upgrading the whole kernel is not a way to go for me here, becouse company is using montavista kernel, and if I upgrade the whole kernel, I would have to port all their patches also. I believe that MontaVista will use higher kernel version some time, so I wouldn't go backporting driver to 2.6.10, but I would prefer to port USB part of kernel from 2.6.10 to 2.6.13. Do you think that is possible and how hard would it be? Best regards Uros >> Are changes only in usb part of kernel, or are there also some >> changes in other parts of kernel, that I would have to port? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Best regards >> >> Uros >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list >> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org >> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded >> >> >> >> >> > >
