On May 19, 2005, at 4:26 PM, Guillaume Autran wrote:

> You are right, moving the event clearing statement is much easier and 
> cleaner. Let the interrupt be the loop.

I also just had the thought we could check the events for non-zero,
clear them, and process only the ones we wanted.  That would save
the interrupt overhead if we had high speed ports (which I really
don't like for normal RS-232 anyway :-)).

I'll move this patch ahead.

Thanks.


        -- Dan


Reply via email to