On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 06:27, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 05:44, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > >> Maybe we could even have a (searchable) patch database so that > >> submissions, even if rejected, don't get lost completely. > > > > BugZilla works great for this. > > i'm not sure it needs to be that detailed or precise; i was just > thinking of a more general summary of "things we're working on or that > have to be dealt with at some point." whatever works.
The cool thing about BugZilla is that it can do that, as well as keep track of patches (pending, etc), a history of what's happened with the problem and much more. It's not hard to set up or administer and its usefulness more than pays for the pain... -- Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com> MLB Associates ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
