> That's right. Is there a reason for boards to have different > mappings? I can well believe that there is, but the current tree > doesn't show it - all the boards (in the tree) that have PCI appear to > do the same initialisation of the windows. It doesn't seem worthwhile > to create board specific PCI initialisation hooks until we have a > board that needs it.
If all boards are suppose to have the same mapping, why doesn't someone document it as such? It would have saved me a lot of time. If it isn't a good enough rule to be documented then make the system flexible enough to take a different path if required. (proactive) ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
