Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > In message <4.3.2.20010130074919.00bb0a80 at falcon.si.com> > Jerry Van Baren wrote: > > > > One of the differences between the ABI and EABI is that the EABI > > requires 8 byte alignment of the stack and the ABI requires 16 byte > > alignment (EABI, p.28). > > Yes, ok. But what is implemented by GCC and glibc? The SVR4 ABI or > the EABI? > > In other words: Wolfgang Grandegger wants to know if we must align > "private" stack frames on 8 or 16 byte boundaries... > > Wolfgang Denk >
linux implements SVR4 with exceptions that we don't return small(8 or less bytes) structs in r3,r4 as the standard say we should. Could be more things I have not noticed we are anyway closer to SVR4 than EABI. -- Kenneth Johansson Ericsson Business Innovation AB Tel: +46 8 404 71 83 Vider?gatan 3 Fax: +46 8 404 72 72 164 80 Stockholm kenneth.johansson at inn.ericsson.se ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
