Matt Porter wrote: > Same here, I see that no one has raised a technical issue with the > flattened device tree method. Since it is a working mechanism AND it > unifies the arch, it's the clear choice over reinventing the wheel. > All we need is an implementation.
Well don't go writing it as I'll get there sometime soon - just need chance to fit it in with worky stuff this week. If you don't see a patch from me by the weekend then you're welcome to hit me with large pointy sticks at next OLS. Jon.
