On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 07:16:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: ... >> in that case, if you wanted to configure "CPM SCC Ethernet", why >> would you go under "MPC8xx CPM Options" rather than the general >> networking menu? this is clearly inconsistent. > > Because the CPM1/CPM2 enet drivers are still waiting to be cleaned up a > bit more, and moved there. The FEC enet driver that Pantelis wrote > lives in drivers/net/ for example.
ok, that's cool. >> more to the point, i've always found it a bit strange that selecting >> "8xx" as a processor would suddenly cause the top-level "MPC8xx CPM >> Options" menu to appear, when other 8xx-related stuff was still >> scattered elswewhere throughout the kernel source tree. > > That's kinda the opposite direction of where I want things to move. ... i wasn't really arguing for any *particular* rearrangement, just arguing for *some* rearrangement that would be more consistent in terms of layout, that's all. and it sounds like it's already underway, so i'll shut up about it now. rday
