On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410081643100.25430 at dell.enoriver.com> you wrote: >> >> nice idea, but sadly, doomed to failure. note that the code to copy >> the patch arrays *requires* you to be able to take the sizeof() those >> arrays to know *exactly* how much to copy. if you pass the array to a >> function by its address, i'm pretty sure you lose the ability to take >> its sizeof() anymore, isn't that right? > > This is not right. Guess how memcpy() works - it's a function, btw.
sure. and it accepts a size parameter, which is why it works. i'm not sure what you're getting at. rday
