On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:11:48AM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:02:21AM -0700, Lawrence E. Bakst wrote: > > At 4:23 PM -0700 5/14/04, Matt Porter wrote: > > >There is a tree, bk://source.mvista.com/linux-2.5-ocp, that has most > > >4xx boards working, but it's 2.6.5. The core 4xx support is moving into > > >current 2.6, but it will be a little bit longer until important drivers > > >like EMAC and IIC are merged into the stock kernel. > > > > Is the linux-2.5-ocp tree still the right place to get 2.6 4xx code or has > > that code been moved upstream or someplace else? > > Linux-2.5-ocp is obsolete. > > > To be more specific which tree to a "bk clone" to get the latest stuff for > > 4xx. > > Use kernel.org's BK tree: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
Oh my, I really should have killed off the old tree. -- Matt Porter mporter at kernel.crashing.org
