In message <001001c25e1e$c9c33ac0$7301a8c0 at zhongqx> you wrote:
>
> I want to use FEC(100M) and SCC1(10M) interface,but they can not work
> together.
They can.
> eth0: CPM ENET Version 0.2 on SCC1, 00:d0:93:00:12:34
> eth1: FEC ENET Version 0.2, FEC irq 3, MII irq 4, addr 00:d0:93:80:12:34
Please be aware that both interfaces use the same MAC address. This
is ok as long as you don;t try to connect bioth to the same subnet.
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 40k init
> init started: BusyBox v0.60.2 (2002.07.18-17:16+0000) multi-call SIOCADDRT:
> Net
> work is unreachable
>
> ******(What reason ? when this message output?)
Well, it makes little sense to guess how you ifconfig'ed the
interfaces, please provide more information.
My bet is that you tired to run both ethernet ports in the same
network, and that you're experiencing a conflict caused by two
identical MAC addresses.
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
"I find this a nice feature but it is not according to the documen-
tation. Or is it a BUG?" "Let's call it an accidental feature. :-)"
- Larry Wall in <6909 at jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
