On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 02:34 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 06 July 2007, Mark Fortescue wrote: > > For me, the requirement is to keep support for the cards indicated in > > arch/ppc/config/xxx_defconfig (as I have one that I might what to use with > > linux) in the same way as they are supported in ARCH=ppc. > > The one thing that is holding up the transition to arch/powerpc is lack > of people with access to the respective boards. If you have one board > that you care about, it would be good if you look into getting it moved > over. Tell us if you have problems doing so. It shouldn't be all that > hard any more, and if it is, maybe some documentation is missing.
It's not just lack of boards. It's lack of understanding of the requirements to get a board port into arch/powerpc. Namely, the device tree stuff. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
