On 8/5/07, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/5/07, Joachim Förster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tag v2.6.22 (Linus) > > branch master (Linus) > > branch virtex-dev (your v2.6.22 based branch) > > > > I had to make different patches, because one version didn't apply > > cleanly to the other branches, due to differences in a Kconfig file e.g. > > and above all in the virtex_devices.c file. > > > > Now, my question is: Which one should I post to the mailing list? (after > > testing these patches - I haven't got a chance yet to test them on real > > hardware - compilation is ok). > > Post the one against master, ultimately that's where the code needs to > go. I'll take care of any conflicts with my tree, and v2.6.22 is > irrelevant (at least as far as getting things into mainline is > concerned). :-) > > > > One more thing: I made two parts, one patch adds the driver and the > > other one makes the registration with the platform bus. Is this ok? (I > > saw this scheme in your virtex-dev branch.) > > Absolutely! Splitting it up into logical changes is the right way to do it. > > > Meanwhile, I had a _very_ short look into ASoC ... and I don't really > > know ... My driver already uses the AC97 Layer of ALSA, so in some way > > the codec is already separated from the controller. Xilinx' AC97 > > Controller Reference does have some very bad impact on the codec which > > forced me to implement codec register shadowing ... hmmmm, I have to > > look at it (ASoC) again - as soon as there is more (free)time ... > > Heh, okay. I haven't dug into ASoC either, so I can't make too many comments.
One more thing; make sure you CC the ALSA list when you post. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (403) 399-0195 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
