On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:41 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:32:50PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > Not completely implausible, but a) why isn't this seen on basically > > every machine with software TLB? b) why does -local- GDB, which is > > presumably doing much less work than gdbserver + network stack, not fail? > > You said it yourself. Local gdb does more work -> blows through more > TLB entries. > > I can't answer you about the other half, but I'm pretty sure TLB > invalidation is already supposed to be happening... somewhere.
Yes. do_wp_page() -> ptep_clear_flush() -> flush_tlb_page() Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
