Hallo Mark, On Tuesday 13 November 2007 14:59:56 lokowich wrote:
> A follow-up: The first version of our termination network was based > on the Lite5200 reference design, but was confirmed by Freescale to > be inadequate. We revised the hardware per their errata, terminating > both ends of the data bus. This fixed the problem. Thanks for the > helpful feedback. If I can remember it correctly, the is no errata on the Freescale documentation web pages specifying to terminate the SDRAM data lines on both ends. The only document I can remember that specifies something similar is AN3045, "A comparison of the MPC5200B (Mask Set M62C) with prior MPC5200 Versions" on page 2, in the chapter "1. Overview". Could you please give me some hint about what errata or other document we probably missed? Maybe I have to tell our HW people that it will be necessary to fix our design as well. Thank you Roman -- Roman Fietze Telemotive AG Büro Mühlhausen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
