Benedict, Michael wrote: > I was playing around with the LED heartbeat trigger and it caught the > BUG() code when trying to activate. Does anyone know why this call > stack would be in_atomic()? Or any ideas for a patch that would allow > the heartbeat trigger to allocate when it is not in atomic context? > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:3024 > in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0 > Call Trace: > [def3dd90] [c0008e60] show_stack+0x48/0x194 (unreliable) > [def3ddc0] [c0014160] __might_sleep+0xd0/0xdc > [def3dde0] [c0063e60] kmem_cache_zalloc+0xdc/0x12c > [def3de00] [c01975c0] heartbeat_trig_activate+0x24/0x80 > [def3de20] [c0196844] led_trigger_set+0x128/0x160 > [def3de40] [c0196988] led_trigger_store+0x10c/0x1a8 > [def3deb0] [c0162f40] class_device_attr_store+0x44/0x5c > [def3dec0] [c00ae614] sysfs_write_file+0x114/0x1dc > [def3def0] [c0068ea4] vfs_write+0x9c/0x110 > [def3df10] [c0068ff4] sys_write+0x4c/0x90 > [def3df40] [c000fc00] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38 > --- Exception: c01 at 0xfe83818 > LR = 0xfe35448 > > Kernel 2.6.22-4, powerpc, targeting an MPC 8347.
>From a brief glance at the code, looks like led_trigger_store is holding a rwlock while calling led_trigger_set. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
