Actually, with the MPMC3 the XPS_LL_TEMAC still can directly connect to
the MPMC. You set one of the ports' type to SDMA and it instantiates
what is similar to the old CDMAC. 

________________________________

From: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:36 AM
To: Koss, Mike (Mission Systems); David Baird;
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC


Hi

Well, As you know, we now need a PLB version, XPS_LL_TEMAC is connected
to PLB not MPMC2...yes I remember those days of Xilinx GSRD and MPMC2
however it seems that the current architecture has slight changes. 

about the git repository of Xilinx, Although I do not believe on it,
I'll give it a try...thanks for info.

well, what about Grant Likely... and his git tree?



________________________________

        Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
        Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:44:14 -0600
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[email protected]
        
        
        In case anyone is interested, I'm currently working on an
almost-kernel-ready version that will be self-contained based on the
LL-DMA version (the native MPMC port, not the PLB). It's based upon the
old adapter from MontaVista, that I originally ported to 2.6 and the
MPMC2. Unfortunately, it won't be ready for another few weeks since I'm
working on hardware images currently.
         
        -- Mike
        
        
________________________________

        From: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 3:54 AM
        To: David Baird; [email protected]
        Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
        
        
        thanks for you reply david,
        
        As far as I know the Linux driver for Xilinx PLB TEMAC was two
parts : 1- adapter.c and 2- the rest of the driver files
        
        Only adapter.c was really a linux related file and the rest of
the files were Xilinx generic driver code for PLB TEMAC.
        
        correct?
        
        then now, I know EDK 9.2 generates the needed Linux support
package and needed related files, so if this is the case can we use
these files as the needed driver in our linux kernel?
        
        by the way, i did never hear about this git repository
before...can you describe us, where is it and how we can access it and
which projects are now hosted by it?
        
        
        thanks
        
        
        > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:54:30 -0700
        > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Subject: Re: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
        > 
        > On Jan 21, 2008 12:36 AM, Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        > > As you know Xilinx PLB TEMAC is a module which connects Hard
TEMAC in
        > > Virtex-4 FX devices to PLB bus,
        > > now, in the new release of EDK , EDK 9.2 Xilinx has added a
new interface
        > > core , which is called XPS_LL_TEMAC and has a different
structure than
        > > normal PLB TEMAC. spacially it has some additional data
transfer buses.
        > >
        > > Now the question is,... is there any linux driver available
for this new
        > > core?
        > 
        > Yes there is, but I had to use the git sources at:
        > 
        > git.xilinx.com
        
        
________________________________

        <http://> 


________________________________

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

Reply via email to