I am also having problems with PCI-E device LSI 1064E on 2.6.24-rc6 kernel. This is running on 8641D processor.
I can see the device, access the config space, but seems access from device to memory is not working. Same device (same exact hardware) works fine for 2.6.15 kernel. - Siva -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:30:35 -0500 From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Migrating from 2.6.11 to 2.6.23 breaks pci-e with LSI 1068 SAS chip To: Vince Asbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes On Jun 24, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Vince Asbridge wrote: > All, > > I'm new to this mailing list, but have not had any luck finding > information on this issue. > > Please be kind if I break the forum rules on my first post. > > We recently tried to upgrade our Freescale CDS 8548 look-alike > module (code name ATCA1000) from the 2.6.11 based BSP to the 2.6.23 > based BSP. > > The upgrade went fairly smoothly, until we tried using SOME pci-e > devices (some work fine, some don't show up to lspci). > > LSI pci-e controllers no longer show up at all! > > We see the ixgbe (intel 10G), SiliconImage SATA controller but do > not see LSI devices (Specifically 1068 SAS, FC949-E fibrechannel). > > We're guessing it's a resource issue behind the bridge, because the > LSI devices try to allocate 1 - 3M behind the bridge, but we can't > find the bug, or where we would debug such an issue. > > The devices seem to "train" correctly, because we have an LED on the > pci-e switch (PLX 8 port pci-e switch), and it's ON indicating pci-e > link between the bridge and the 1068 device). > > We're totally at a loss as to why this always worked on the 2.6.11 > kernel but doesn?t work on 2.6.23. > > Using lspci, the LSI adapters do not show up in the list at all, as > though they are not plugged into the system. > > Is there something that needs to be done with respect to PCI-E > devices that is new in the 2.6.23 based BSP that did not need to be > done in the 2.6.11 based kit? For example, are pci resources > allocated by a different piece of code, that may have some issue > allocating resources for the LSI adapters? > > > Can you tree 2.6.25? There are some fixes in that kernel related to PCIe support: [POWERPC] FSL: Rework PCI/PCIe support for 85xx/86xx However, its odd that lspci doesn't even show the device. Are you using u-boot? if so what version? and does u-boot see the LSI? - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded