> -----Original Message----- > From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 8:17 AM > To: Keller, Jacob E > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] Move PI step threshold > and max frequency settings to common servo code. > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 06:50:46PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote: > > How difficult would it be to have it complain that the old configuration > > name is deprecated in favor of the new name? It might not be worth > > doing, but if it's not too difficult, I think that would be valuable. I > > think this could be done in a separate section check, without > > duplicating the setup code. > > I think that's easy to do. If we tell users to update their config, > how long will we wait before actually dropping them from the code? >
Not really sure. But I would like to be able to warn about using old option names. Thanks, Jake > -- > Miroslav Lichvar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
