On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:32:11AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > BTW, is running two ptp4l instances in the same PTP domain a valid use > case? Appending the number to the socket name would not help here. It > looks like we might need a more general approach anyway.
Yes, I think it is a valid use case. For example, you might have a multi-homed grand-master serving two separate networks, both with domain 0. I still think it is easiest and best to just let the user choose the name of the socket. Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
