On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03:42PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> 
> I can look at this though it will take a lot more real time since I have
> less to dedicate to it. But I am interested in solving this.

If you are agreeable, then I would say let's take the extra time to do
it right.  We just cut a release, and so there is no rush.

> What about section settings for things like the per-adapter stuff? This
> is where it got really complicated.

Yup, also for per-port defaults, we need to put on our thinking caps,
but it shouldn't mean rocket science.
 
> Other question I have regarding this, is should we share options between
> programs? I think this is ok, because in reality if you *need* differing
> options for each program you can just use a separate file.

Agreed. Most or even all relevant options (eg domain number) can be
shared between ptp4l, phc2sys, and pmc.  I can't think of any option
that can't be shared, but maybe we'll find one along the way.

Thanks,
Richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to