On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03:42PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote: > > I can look at this though it will take a lot more real time since I have > less to dedicate to it. But I am interested in solving this.
If you are agreeable, then I would say let's take the extra time to do it right. We just cut a release, and so there is no rush. > What about section settings for things like the per-adapter stuff? This > is where it got really complicated. Yup, also for per-port defaults, we need to put on our thinking caps, but it shouldn't mean rocket science. > Other question I have regarding this, is should we share options between > programs? I think this is ok, because in reality if you *need* differing > options for each program you can just use a separate file. Agreed. Most or even all relevant options (eg domain number) can be shared between ptp4l, phc2sys, and pmc. I can't think of any option that can't be shared, but maybe we'll find one along the way. Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel