On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:34:58PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > Whether or not ptp4l should set IPV6_V6ONLY unconditionally needs some > more thinking, but my first impression is it would need to use IPv4 > multicast addresses (v4-mapped to IPv6) to send the packets to the v4 > hosts and not the IPv6 multicast addresses. This doesn't seem worth the > complications and IPV6_V6ONLY looks like to be appropriate here. But > somebody should think it through first :-)
Yes, we should add the socket option. Patch anyone? Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
