On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 20:14 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > Therefore the code performs a BIST to ensure that the options are > properly populated. In addition, the code terminates the program in > case of missing options or type mismatches. This heavy handed > approach is meant to catch errors during development and should never > trigger during normal usage.
If I understand this correctly, this means that a user passing a configuration file missing any option the program reads we will terminate the whole program instead of selecting the default? I think this is the safest approach but we will want to ensure we document that you can't leave items out if you use a configuration file as I suspect that will not be necessarily expected behavior. Or do I mis-understand this? Regards, Jake ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel