On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 20:14 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Therefore the code performs a BIST to ensure that the options are
> properly populated.  In addition, the code terminates the program in
> case of missing options or type mismatches.  This heavy handed
> approach is meant to catch errors during development and should never
> trigger during normal usage.

If I understand this correctly, this means that a user passing a
configuration file missing any option the program reads we will
terminate the whole program instead of selecting the default?

I think this is the safest approach but we will want to ensure we
document that you can't leave items out if you use a configuration file
as I suspect that will not be necessarily expected behavior.

Or do I mis-understand this?

Regards,
Jake
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to