On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:37:53PM -0600, Bassam Alsanie wrote: > I will be going over the PHC APIs and some of the kernel PHC modules to get > deeper understand. > Just to let you know why my questions seem little bit weird. I am working > on developing a user mode framework for to accessing the hardware (for > rapid prototyping). I found its useful to develop a user mode code to > access the custom clock (can take as low as one day of development time)
You have already been at this for a few days. > then update the linuxptp (ptp4l) to adjust the frequency on the clock using > the user-mode code, instead of calling into the PHC framework which require > kernel support. > This is not permanent solution nor to replace the current PHC framework, > its just to characterise the hardware and perform some initial tests in a > very short time. Then after that move to follow the PHC model to make the > final implementation. Your approach is a waste of time. If you waste your own time, that is your own business. Please don't waste *our* time with it any more. Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
