On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:51:35PM +0000, Erik Hons wrote: > Is there a technical or deliberate reason that ptp4l doesn't support > 802.1AS time-aware bridge?
The only reason is that this feature would be a lot of work. > If not, would the project be open to that being contributed? (Wow, you have it already? Please post it ;) I already did a simple proof of concept for a P2P TC, and that is not too different from a TAB. I know the direction to go, but it will have to wait until I find some free time... So I do want to have TC/TAB in linuxptp for version 2.0. Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
