On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:00:30AM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:27:34AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > Do you think it would be worth adding support for the hybrid > > multicast/unicast mode, where only delay request and response are > > unicast, in order to save network traffic in very large networks? > > If I understand it correctly, this might work without the registration > > part of the protocol. > > We've got that already, as of v1.6. > > 776f772 Merge the hybrid E2E work. > e85cb68 Support hybrid E2E using unicast delay requests and responses.
Awesome, I didn't realize we already have that :). Full unicast support doesn't seem very useful to me, but maybe I just didn't see the right use case for it. Thanks, -- Miroslav Lichvar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
