On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:37:23AM +0000, Rommel, Albrecht wrote: > There are some applications where a PTP clock node (i.e. a > master-only-ordinary-clock) will be configured from remote in a > secure environment, i.e. NETCONF YANG, or other transport technology > (ITU PON, IEEE PON, DOCSIS) specific management protocols. As you > mentioned, these elements are profile specific, the profile won't > change dynamically, but there is the requirement to configure the > profile via the management protocols mentioned above. Having the SET > option via UDS to the individual elements as listed in table 40 > 1588-2008 would be great. The above management protocols could be > (locally) translated to UDS.
Right. At the end of the day, we will have a number of incompatible SNMP MIBs for PTP, including the power profile, gPTP, and Yang. Any of these can be implemented in stand alone programs that translate SNMP into PTP over UDS. But so far, we seen exactly zero lines of code offered to implement any of the SNMP stuff. :( > Any timeline for that? How do you estimate the effort for implementation? Personally, I have no interest in this, but as I said before, I will consider patches for inclusion... Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
