Hi Richard, Jake 2017-04-04 3:44 GMT+02:00 Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com>: > You mean the call to tsproc_reset() after SERVO_JUMP... > which passes fail=0, preserving tsproc->filter_delay. Since we took > the trouble to keep filter_delay, then yes, we should also use it!
Exaclty. Hearing no complains I propose the attached patch. > Like Jake said, your patch is whitespace damaged. Thanks for the info, I am now using your pre-commit hook. Burkhard
0001-tsproc_update_offset-fails-when-it-should-succeed.patch
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
