Wednesday, March 21, 2018 6:48 PM >alphabetical order please
Ok, I will change. I usually put it in the order it is implemented in code. > How about introducing a helper to prune the list. Added delay_req_prune and delay_req_current >You only prune the list when a new request arrives. Is that >sufficient or should a timer (like the sync timer) also be used? Added prune before new delay_req is sent and if announce receipt tmo expires >This doesn't handle the case out of order packets. Use the "prune" >helper here, too. I removed the old obsolete check, but I did not add prune here. Do not find it necessary since it is pruned before each delay_req and if announce expires. The prune function made the solution much cleaner. Thanks for comments once again. Anders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
