On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 04:20:29PM -0700, Cliff Spradlin via Linuxptp-devel wrote: > I don't think that an automotive network is sufficiently different from an > industrial network to necessitate a special profile, especially one that > changes core behavior of the protocol.
+1 I agree with the sentiment in this and your other reply. We don't hack random options all over the code. But, if the profile can be supported by adding non-invasive options, then we should implement as much as we can. The real problem of this patch is the approach. Instead of adding discrete options, it hacks its way in, ignoring the modular design that we already have in place. Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
