On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 08:14:04AM +0000, FUSTE Emmanuel wrote:
> Running the command compiled without PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE support on a
> kernel (and perhaps the hardware) with PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE will
> return a definitively wrong answer.
Yeah, this isn't ideal.
Saying "unknown" is also a bit weird. People will wonder, why can't
you tell?
How about this:
/* from linux kernel v4.19-rc4 */
struct compat_caps {
int max_adj; /* Maximum frequency adjustment in parts per billon. */
int n_alarm; /* Number of programmable alarms. */
int n_ext_ts; /* Number of external time stamp channels. */
int n_per_out; /* Number of programmable periodic signals. */
int pps; /* Whether the clock supports a PPS callback. */
int n_pins; /* Number of input/output pins. */
/* Whether the clock supports precise system-device cross timestamps */
int cross_timestamping;
int rsv[13]; /* Reserved for future use. */
};
and then
static int do_caps(clockid_t clkid, int cmdc, char *cmdv[])
{
union {
struct ptp_clock_caps caps;
struct compat_caps compat;
} u;
...
// check u.compat.cross_timestamping
}
Hm?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
