> -----Original Message----- > From: Keller, Jacob E > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:42 PM > To: 'Sanjay Bhandari' <san...@ziffusion.com> > Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-users] forcing PASSIVE role for a port? >
I forgot to reply to the list. > > From: Sanjay Bhandari [mailto:san...@ziffusion.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 11:52 AM> > > To: linuxptp-us...@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: [Linuxptp-users] forcing PASSIVE role for a port? > > > > It helps if you keep the list messages as plain text, and not HTML. > > > Is there a way to set a port in the PASSIVE role with ptp4l? > > > > Essentially, we want to listen in on the protocol, but not generate ANY > > protocol > messages ourselves. Nor do we want to set the PHC from any master. > > > > Is there a way to achieve this? > > Does using free_running, along with --slave-only do what you want? > > I don't think you're going to get a mode which only listens and doesn't do ANY > messages back out... For that I'd suggest tcpdump and implement a filter that > can > read the PTP messages and show relevant fields for you. > > Thanks, > Jake _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
