On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:22, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:08:50PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > But otherwise, why does current linuxptp even attempt to receive a > > follow-up frame before the sync has arrived, if reordering is somebody > > else's problem? > > I think it's expected that two messages sent within few microseconds or > milliseconds can be received in a wrong order and PTP slaves need to > handle that. But it's not expected that a message will be delayed so > much that it will be received after a message that was sent one or > more sync intervals later.
Not even if I'm testing with logSyncInterval -5? > > -- > Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
