On 3/4/2020 9:06 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:07:52PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> Good, the name is marked as constant. Side note, for those interface_*
>> functions that don't modify the interface, does it make sense to mark
>> them as taking a const interface pointer?
> I have heard C++ people insisting on this, but frankly IMHO it doesn't
> make any sense.  If the implementation of the "class" is completely
> hidden, as it should be, then the caller should not care what happens
> offstage.  That is none of the caller's business.
> Thanks,
> Richard



Linuxptp-devel mailing list

Reply via email to