On 3/4/2020 9:06 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:07:52PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>
>> Good, the name is marked as constant. Side note, for those interface_*
>> functions that don't modify the interface, does it make sense to mark
>> them as taking a const interface pointer?
> 
> I have heard C++ people insisting on this, but frankly IMHO it doesn't
> make any sense.  If the implementation of the "class" is completely
> hidden, as it should be, then the caller should not care what happens
> offstage.  That is none of the caller's business.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> 

Sure.

Thanks,
Jake


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to