On 3/4/2020 9:06 AM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:07:52PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote: >> >> Good, the name is marked as constant. Side note, for those interface_* >> functions that don't modify the interface, does it make sense to mark >> them as taking a const interface pointer? > > I have heard C++ people insisting on this, but frankly IMHO it doesn't > make any sense. If the implementation of the "class" is completely > hidden, as it should be, then the caller should not care what happens > offstage. That is none of the caller's business. > > Thanks, > Richard >
Sure. Thanks, Jake _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel