On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:16:23 -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > But maybe that wouldn't be worst thing in the world. There is a trade > off between maintaining parallel copies of ptp_clock_caps and the > convenience of compiling the stack just once with the "future" kernel > definitions. > > Thoughts?
The decision is ultimately yours but I'd prefer the copy of the struct in missing.h. Thanks, Jiri _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
