On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 15:47, Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 03:41:09PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > Ok, and this patch does not have a place in linuxptp because? > > It is a matter of style, as I already said. > > Thanks,
Again, I would have accepted any technical argument you could bring. Like, for example, the fact that this sleep on recv() is becoming impossible after patch "[PATCH v2 2/3] clock: dump unexpected packets received on the error queues of sockets" (which _is_ fixing a ptp4l application bug), even without MSG_DONTWAIT in place. But you prefer to bring the style argument. So, as a matter of personal style, I think the only right thing for me to do is to retreat now. Feel free to use any portion of the patches I submitted so far in any combination you see desirable. Thanks, -Vladimir _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
