> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:40 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
> Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/15] posix_clock_open: derive PHC
> index from device name if possible
> 
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:12:02PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> > Here, we are making the implicit assumption that all ptp clock devices
> > will always have /dev/ptpX format. I don't think anyone is crazy enough
> > to rename these devices...
> 
> (Not yet, anyways  ;^)
> 
> > An alternative (requiring kernel implementation maybe?) would be to read
> > the phc index from the kernel somehow. It doesn't look like this is
> > exported anywhere else besides the name.
> 
> How about /sys/class/ptp/ptpX/clock_index ?
> 
> Is that something you would like to code up for the lkml?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard

To make this fully work we'll probably want to adjust the LinuxPTP code base 
with a phc_index_to_dev function that scans the sys/class/ptp folder for the 
matching clock based on the index to obtain the name. I'll see about adding 
that as well (with a fallback to attempting /dev/ptpX if clock_index doesn't 
exist)

Thanks,
Jake


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to