Hi Richard, Am Di., 29. Sept. 2020 um 01:01 Uhr schrieb Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:37:03PM +0200, Heiko Thiery wrote: > > I just want to understand when the defines/functions coming from > > missing.h should come into account. What uclib(-ng) version should be > > support here? > > I think the audience for uClibc is small, and so we needn't support > every last uClibc version.
Ok. sounds reasonable to me. > > However, one of my boards [1] has a TI Phyter attached to a coldfire, > and the toolchain has uclibc-0.9.30.23. I really need to keep that > board operational for smoke testing, but I have nothing against > supporting the latest uClibc from buildroot. > > So please help me by picking one of the two options. > > 1. Patch missing.h so that 0.9.30 and the latest greatest both work. > I can test build whatever you come up with. > I will provide a patch that should support both. > 2. Help me build/obtain an up-to-date coldfire toolchain. > You could try to use a toolchain from https://toolchains.bootlin.com/. There is a toolchain for the coldfire with uclibc-ng 1.0.32: https://toolchains.bootlin.com/downloads/releases/toolchains/m68k-coldfire/tarballs/m68k-coldfire--uclibc--stable-2020.02-2.tar.bz2 -- Heiko _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
