On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:12:54AM +0000, Matt Sanders (matt8) wrote: > and uses the mechanisms that the standard implies to resolve the > problem.
I disagree with your intrepretation of the what the standard "implies". > What’s > your objection to going down this path? Check the list archives. You will find people trying to justify letting broken hardware tag on any amount of random bytes onto PTP frames. You haven't even explained WHY your change is so important. What is the use case? AFAICT, receiving the FCS is totally useless. After all, it must be correct, otherwise the MAC would drop the frame. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
