On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:07:41AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > What will happen with the "grandmaster" term? Does it stay, or should
No decision yet on that one. > it be replaced with something like "Primary time server"? That sound reasonable to me. > My only concern is the risk that the next standard will use a > different terminology and linuxptp users will have have to go through > the transition twice. We can choose the terminology we like without causing confusion. In fact, thanks to your insight of differentiating server/client and source/sink, this project will have clear and helpful documentation! The *only* things we'll have to adapt to the new standard (if and when it ever appears) are the log messages that include port states. Those will optionally follow the new terminology. For now, I'm keeping almost all log messages unchanged, because some users are surely have scripts that scrape through the logs. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
