> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 10:58 PM > To: Y.b. Lu <yangbo...@nxp.com> > Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Miroslav Lichvar > <mlich...@redhat.com> > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [v2] msg: bump to IEEE 1588-2019 version > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 02:42:40AM +0000, Y.b. Lu wrote: > > My fault. I Just forgot the message printed. How about, > > > > versionNumber 2 > > minorVersionNumber 1 > > > > This may match field definition in standard. Considering it's only message > printed, I think either is ok. > > What do you think? > > I prefer keeping the same number of lines and words in the ascii > output, like this: > > versionNumber 2 (older pmc) > versionNumber 2.1 (new pmc) > > Why? > > Because that makes life easier for people who have scripts that parse > the ascii output. The needed changes are smaller.
Thank you very much. Sent v3. > > Thanks, > Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
