Hi Miroslav, Please find our response inline.
Thanks, Amar B S > -----Original Message----- > From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlich...@redhat.com] > Sent: 31 May 2021 14:38 > To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] clockcheck: Increase minimum > interval. > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Altiostar. Do not click on > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and you are sure the > content is safe. You will never be asked to reset your Altiostar password via > email. > > > Increase the minimum check interval to 1 second to measure the frequency > offset more accurately and with default configuration make false positives > less > likely due to a heavily overloaded system. > > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> > --- > clockcheck.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/clockcheck.c b/clockcheck.c index d0b4714..f0141be 100644 > --- a/clockcheck.c > +++ b/clockcheck.c > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ > #include "clockcheck.h" > #include "print.h" > > -#define CHECK_MIN_INTERVAL 100000000 > +#define CHECK_MIN_INTERVAL 1000000000 > #define CHECK_MAX_FREQ 900000000 With the proposed patch/change, didn't see the clock check jump issue again in our setup. We are seeing few other observations which needs further analysis and see if it has any relevance to the patch. Need some time to conclude on this > > struct clockcheck { > -- > 2.26.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxptp-devel mailing list > Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
