On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:44:21AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:37:27PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > The other topic is how to actually wait for phc2sys to synchronize,
> > since the program presented here only works with ptp4l (or at least
> > that's all I tested).
> 
> If it is the system clock, phc2sys clears the STA_UNSYNC flag
> (which is reported by ntp_gettime()/ntp_adjtime()) when the servo is
> in the locked state. There is the esterror (and potentially also
> maxerror) field, which could be set by ptp4l/phc2sys to some estimate
> of the error. Any application could easily check the value to decide
> if the clock is good enough for its purposes. No need to implement PTP
> or have access to the ptp4l/phc2sys socket.
> 
> I think it would be great if all PTP clocks had this status and
> esterror/maxerror fields. For example, with the ptp_kvm driver guests
> have access to the system clock of the host as a PHC, but there is no
> way to check if/how well the clock is actually synchronized.
> 
> I had this on my todo list for a long time, but wasn't able to look
> into it yet.

There are clearly some merits to this idea, but I don't know if it would
cater to the use case where you want to send some traffic on a port that
is a PTP master, and you want to know whether the slaves attached to you
are synchronized?


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to