On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:08:00PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > If the only reason for these ifdefs is an optimization for older > kernels, I think it's ok to remove them as this runs only once on > start. I'd prefer code that is easier to read, even if it does > something unnecessary.
+1 > I'd prefer these ifdefs to be removed too, but if others agree it > should stay, would it make sense to move it to port_change_phc(), > which would accept the fd and port_link_status, so it could call > rtnl_link_status() if the support is missing? Agree that the ifdefs should go. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
