On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:57:40AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:36:12AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > > Nit: please prefix with rtnl_ > > Even when it is a static function? Most static functions in the > codebase don't seems to have a matching prefix, so I'm unsure why > this one.
You are right, of course, but as the code base grows it gets more and more useful for grep/cscope. So for new code, I'd like to have the pendantic prefixes. > In any case, would you like me to send a v2 now or should I wait for > comments on the other patches from the series? Looks good otherwise, please send v2. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
