On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:23:10PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote: > If a port goes down because of loss of link, ptp4l tries to avoid > clearing the fault. However, if you set fault_reset_interval to ASAP, > then ptp4l immediately clears the fault and tries to send and eventually > gets a timeout. > > Is this expected behavior?
Yes. > I feel like we might want to be checking the > port link state to ensure that we don't clear the fault if link on the > port is still down (since it will still be unusable). The real solution would be to have different knobs for each kind of fault, but it is probably not worth the effort since the real world benefit is small. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
