On Tue Aug 30 2022, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>> @@ -196,6 +196,19 @@ static int udp_open(struct transport *t, struct
>> interface *iface,
>> pr_warning("Failed to set general DSCP priority.");
>> }
>>
>> + socket_priority = config_get_int(t->cfg, "global", "socket_priority");
>> +
>> + if (socket_priority &&
>> + setsockopt(efd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_PRIORITY, &socket_priority,
>> + sizeof(socket_priority))) {
>> + pr_warning("Failed to set event socket priority.");
>> + }
>> + if (socket_priority &&
>> + setsockopt(gfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_PRIORITY, &socket_priority,
>> + sizeof(socket_priority))) {
>> + pr_warning("Failed to set general socket priority.");
>
> Is it useful to set the priority for non-event messages? Their timing
> is not so important and there can be a lot of traffic generated
> remotely (e.g. management messages).
Good question :-). I've followed the same logic as for the Layer 2
transport. See commit c15e8c76000c ("ptp4l: Add configuration option for
socket priority").
Thanks,
Kurt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
