On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:32:48AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Add a new function to phc_ctl to display the devices pin configuration
> data. First, obtain the device capabilities to determine the number of
> pins. Then, for each pin, print the name, function, and channel
> information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
> ---
>  phc_ctl.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/phc_ctl.c b/phc_ctl.c
> index 92e597c40a23..1d1b0ab61020 100644
> --- a/phc_ctl.c
> +++ b/phc_ctl.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static void usage(const char *progname)
>               "  freq [ppb]      adjust PHC frequency (default returns 
> current offset)\n"
>               "  cmp             compare PHC offset to CLOCK_REALTIME\n"
>               "  caps            display device capabilities (default if no 
> command given)\n"
> +             "  pin_cfg         display device pin configuration\n"

Can we change it to pins_get or pins_cfg_get to be able to add set in the 
future?
Also s/pin/pins/g

> +     pr_notice("device has %d configurable input/output pins",
> +             caps.n_pins);
> +
> +     /* For each pin, read its configuration */
> +     for (index = 0; index < caps.n_pins; index++) {
> +             memset(&pin_desc, 0, sizeof(pin_desc));
> +             pin_desc.index = index;
> +
> +             if (ioctl(CLOCKID_TO_FD(clkid), PTP_PIN_GETFUNC, &pin_desc)) {
> +                     pr_warning("get pin configuration for pin %d failed: 
> %s",
> +                             index,
> +                             strerror(errno));
> +                     /* keep going */
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +
> +             if (pin_desc.func == PTP_PF_NONE) {
> +                     pr_notice("pin %d [%s] is not configured",
> +                             pin_desc.index,
> +                             pin_desc.name);
> +             } else {
> +                     pr_notice("pin %d [%s] performing %s using channel %d",

Remove "performing" to avoid wordiness :)

But a very useful addition!

Regards
Maciek


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to