Hi, You already submitted the patch seria. Has it changed? If so, please mark it with version 2. "git format-patch -v 2". If not, why do you send it again? I think Richard wanted to close version 4 first.
Erez On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 19:39, Rahul Rameshbabu via Linuxptp-devel < linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > The main focus of this submission is adding support for testing ADJ_OFFSET > with > phc_ctl and querying the maximum supported ADJ_OFFSET adjustment that a > device > is capable of. Some other minor cleanups are also included in the > submission. > > That patch the introduces support for querying the maximum offset > supported by > ADJ_OFFSET depends on a kernel patch series (linked below) that is > targeted for > kernel 6.5. Previously, sent this series out as an RFC to inquire feedback > early > on. Have incorporated that feedback into this submission. > > Link: https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/message/37854603/ > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230612211500.309075-1-rrameshb...@nvidia.com/ > > Rahul Rameshbabu (5): > Rename NSEC2SEC as NSEC_PER_SEC and refactor to util.h > phc_ctl: Add phase command to support ADJ_OFFSET > phc_ctl: Add maximum offset capability > phc_ctl: Use pr_notice instead of pr_err for displaying adjusted > frequency > phc_ctl: Handle errors returned by various clockadj helpers > > missing.h | 9 +++--- > phc_ctl.8 | 4 +++ > phc_ctl.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > port.c | 14 ++++----- > port_private.h | 3 +- > servo.c | 3 +- > tc.c | 6 ++-- > util.h | 2 ++ > 8 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.40.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxptp-devel mailing list > Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel >
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
